Place-Text-Trace: The Fragility of the Spatial Image

The past was over, the future was not there yet and the present was a

future past. Throughout the long nineteenth century, past and present

had become traces and layers, burdened with an inescapable dimension of

absence. Writers, scholars and architects, political theorists, artists,

visitors of museums and exhibitions, the miller in Provence and the

shepherd in the Landes, were facing a rapidly changing world. The

present had become elusive and fragile. The past was irrevocably gone

and other. In an initial context of loss, of dispersion and

disconnection of lands, people, professions and things, new frameworks

of meaning and imagination, of “presentification’, had to be found,

tools of preservation, of restoration, of (re)establishment and

vivification.

Place and text become such tools.

Against a concise background of comparative literature and contemporary

philosophy on absence and presentification, this essay explores spatial

images in French and Belgian nineteenth-century literature, especially

in the work of Chateaubriand, Balzac, Rodenbach and Mistral. It is

argued that the spatial image, as textual space and spatial text, and in

the built environment, operates as a cultural subtext of

presentification. Its disruptive nature, its own fragility and eventual

self-fragmentation reveal the cultural ambiguities of the century’s

tragic and grand strife to make the elusive present eternal, timeless,

fixed, absenceless and complete in the age of traces.