Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
The book critically analyses the jurisprudence of the STF (Supreme Federal Court), the highest court of the Brazilian Judiciary, on the subject of jurisdiction for processing and judging disputes involving work provided to public entities. In the end, the arguments demonstrate the incorrectness of that case law and the need to recognise the material jurisdiction of the Labour Court, broadly, for all actions arising from 'labour relations' lato sensu.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
The book critically analyses the jurisprudence of the STF (Supreme Federal Court), the highest court of the Brazilian Judiciary, on the subject of jurisdiction for processing and judging disputes involving work provided to public entities. In the end, the arguments demonstrate the incorrectness of that case law and the need to recognise the material jurisdiction of the Labour Court, broadly, for all actions arising from 'labour relations' lato sensu.