Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
The kingdoms of Bithynia, Pontus and Cappadocia lay at the borders of the ancient Hellenistic world. In contrast to the larger kingdoms of that time, they were not under the dominance of the Macedonian, but rather of indigenous dynasties. This situation allows us to take a new look at the oft-discussed question of how the spread of Hellenism took place. This study considers the conditions under which cultural contacts occurred in this region. The central emphasis lies in the role of the indigenous kings, who, it is said, purposefully spread Greek culture in their own empires. Although certain aspects of the representation of the kings to a public shaped by Greek norms and values may be considered philhellenism, it must still be pointed out that these kings were only reacting to an already existing system of representing authority. To deduce from that an intentional Hellenistic assimilation toward their indigenous subjects remains problematic. This is a German text.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
The kingdoms of Bithynia, Pontus and Cappadocia lay at the borders of the ancient Hellenistic world. In contrast to the larger kingdoms of that time, they were not under the dominance of the Macedonian, but rather of indigenous dynasties. This situation allows us to take a new look at the oft-discussed question of how the spread of Hellenism took place. This study considers the conditions under which cultural contacts occurred in this region. The central emphasis lies in the role of the indigenous kings, who, it is said, purposefully spread Greek culture in their own empires. Although certain aspects of the representation of the kings to a public shaped by Greek norms and values may be considered philhellenism, it must still be pointed out that these kings were only reacting to an already existing system of representing authority. To deduce from that an intentional Hellenistic assimilation toward their indigenous subjects remains problematic. This is a German text.