Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
The call for more men to act as male role models for children in early years and primary school settings remains prevalent in public and professional discourse as boys’ underachievement and the absence of men in children’s lives continues to dominate education agendas. This work investigates the ambiguous nature of the ‘role model’ by examining the thoughts, perceptions and ideas of men who work/train in the early years (0-8) sector. The research explores definitions and perceptions of the term ‘role model’, highlighting tensions associated with the male role model theory. Research findings suggest that the term ‘male role model’ can be interpreted and defined in a multitude of ways as a result of context, situation and the expectations of different people. Assumptions that the role model is automatically ‘a man’ are challenged, for it is not only argued that both men and women can be role models for boys but that the role model is a ‘status’ which has to be ‘earned’ rather than it being ‘a given’. Even though policy making advocates the role model as having a positive influence on boys, findings suggest that role models can actually have a negative impact on children’s lives.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
The call for more men to act as male role models for children in early years and primary school settings remains prevalent in public and professional discourse as boys’ underachievement and the absence of men in children’s lives continues to dominate education agendas. This work investigates the ambiguous nature of the ‘role model’ by examining the thoughts, perceptions and ideas of men who work/train in the early years (0-8) sector. The research explores definitions and perceptions of the term ‘role model’, highlighting tensions associated with the male role model theory. Research findings suggest that the term ‘male role model’ can be interpreted and defined in a multitude of ways as a result of context, situation and the expectations of different people. Assumptions that the role model is automatically ‘a man’ are challenged, for it is not only argued that both men and women can be role models for boys but that the role model is a ‘status’ which has to be ‘earned’ rather than it being ‘a given’. Even though policy making advocates the role model as having a positive influence on boys, findings suggest that role models can actually have a negative impact on children’s lives.