Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Theory:
To begin a child’s life, a mother, a father and God are needed. The life and childhood begin at conception. If the childhood begins at conception, the parenthood can’t begin nine months later. The two have to start simultaneously. They begin together at conception.
That theory is actually a fact, accordingly to the Book of Genesis.
Project and Results:
While reading Genesis, the author saw one numerical sign, discovered more, and began an entire exegesis of the book. He then noted three unresolved math problems, hard to detect because each was a combination of verses from two or more chapters. Factors from each included parts of the very detailed flood story. The Two years after the flood math problem had been known of for decades, but he searched and found the other enigmas.
The study led far beyond applying theories and discovering signs. It proceeded to solving the three enigmas. Genesis reveals mathematically that years old , lifetime , and age begin at birth, but life and span of life begin at conception. Genesis also discloses mathematically that parenthood and childhood can only begin together at conception. Thinking that way, the math gets resolved; otherwise it does not.
At first the author had only planned to read more Genesis and discuss Christian beliefs. By the end of this project, he had seen that Genesis mathematically disagrees with the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Theory:
To begin a child’s life, a mother, a father and God are needed. The life and childhood begin at conception. If the childhood begins at conception, the parenthood can’t begin nine months later. The two have to start simultaneously. They begin together at conception.
That theory is actually a fact, accordingly to the Book of Genesis.
Project and Results:
While reading Genesis, the author saw one numerical sign, discovered more, and began an entire exegesis of the book. He then noted three unresolved math problems, hard to detect because each was a combination of verses from two or more chapters. Factors from each included parts of the very detailed flood story. The Two years after the flood math problem had been known of for decades, but he searched and found the other enigmas.
The study led far beyond applying theories and discovering signs. It proceeded to solving the three enigmas. Genesis reveals mathematically that years old , lifetime , and age begin at birth, but life and span of life begin at conception. Genesis also discloses mathematically that parenthood and childhood can only begin together at conception. Thinking that way, the math gets resolved; otherwise it does not.
At first the author had only planned to read more Genesis and discuss Christian beliefs. By the end of this project, he had seen that Genesis mathematically disagrees with the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision.