Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…

This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
For years, a gap (technology, experience, doctrine, etc) has existed between the US Navy and its sister services in the area of joint planning and execution at the operational level. The Navy aims to streamline the planning, execution, and assessment process at the operational level and poise Maritime Headquarters (MHQs) to ably take the lead in any assigned JFC mission by permanently marrying the Maritime Headquarters with a Maritime Operations Center (MOC). This concept will allow the Navy to respond to operational level tasking more efficiently by maintaining a staff that is trained and ready to conduct routine navy functions and joint force assigned missions with a minor augmentation of personnel. How can the MHQ with MOC concept enhance Navy/Air Force Joint Air Maritime Operations and close the gap in an environment where common doctrine is not yet law and individual service procedures, technology, and training are historically different? The success of this concept is highly dependent on common global technology, common operational and tactical procedures, embedded joint education, and joint doctrine; without them, MHQ with MOC will be another acronym for how the US Navy continues to evolve in a vacuum.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
Stock availability can be subject to change without notice. We recommend calling the shop or contacting our online team to check availability of low stock items. Please see our Shopping Online page for more details.
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
For years, a gap (technology, experience, doctrine, etc) has existed between the US Navy and its sister services in the area of joint planning and execution at the operational level. The Navy aims to streamline the planning, execution, and assessment process at the operational level and poise Maritime Headquarters (MHQs) to ably take the lead in any assigned JFC mission by permanently marrying the Maritime Headquarters with a Maritime Operations Center (MOC). This concept will allow the Navy to respond to operational level tasking more efficiently by maintaining a staff that is trained and ready to conduct routine navy functions and joint force assigned missions with a minor augmentation of personnel. How can the MHQ with MOC concept enhance Navy/Air Force Joint Air Maritime Operations and close the gap in an environment where common doctrine is not yet law and individual service procedures, technology, and training are historically different? The success of this concept is highly dependent on common global technology, common operational and tactical procedures, embedded joint education, and joint doctrine; without them, MHQ with MOC will be another acronym for how the US Navy continues to evolve in a vacuum.