Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…

This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
This paper studies the question of the role of Airpower in the prevention of genocide. Airpower has multiple roles in preventing and stopping genocide, but primarily in a supporting role, whether supporting other military forces or instruments of power. The primary method of determining Airpower’s potential roles in genocide prevention was via a case study of the Cambodian genocide that occurred under Pol Pot from 1975 to 1979. This paper first discusses the Cambodian genocide in relation to the Eight Stages of Genocide model. Second, it identifies points at which intervention and prevention is possible in genocide. Finally, this paper discusses the uses of Airpower to support intervention and genocide prevention. This paper determines that Airpower provides the means to deliver quickly humanitarian aid to potential victims of genocide and can move ground forces into theater to prevent or stop genocide. Airpower can support the other instruments of power through surveillance and enforcement of approved sanctions. Airpower, by itself, also provides a credible deterrent to those who might commit genocide. Finally, due to its standoff capability, Airpower is often the means of deterrence and prevention most acceptable to the American public, as it does not place as many American lives in danger as ground operations.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
Stock availability can be subject to change without notice. We recommend calling the shop or contacting our online team to check availability of low stock items. Please see our Shopping Online page for more details.
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
This paper studies the question of the role of Airpower in the prevention of genocide. Airpower has multiple roles in preventing and stopping genocide, but primarily in a supporting role, whether supporting other military forces or instruments of power. The primary method of determining Airpower’s potential roles in genocide prevention was via a case study of the Cambodian genocide that occurred under Pol Pot from 1975 to 1979. This paper first discusses the Cambodian genocide in relation to the Eight Stages of Genocide model. Second, it identifies points at which intervention and prevention is possible in genocide. Finally, this paper discusses the uses of Airpower to support intervention and genocide prevention. This paper determines that Airpower provides the means to deliver quickly humanitarian aid to potential victims of genocide and can move ground forces into theater to prevent or stop genocide. Airpower can support the other instruments of power through surveillance and enforcement of approved sanctions. Airpower, by itself, also provides a credible deterrent to those who might commit genocide. Finally, due to its standoff capability, Airpower is often the means of deterrence and prevention most acceptable to the American public, as it does not place as many American lives in danger as ground operations.