This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
"Who Burned Columbia?" delves into the contentious historical debate surrounding the burning of Columbia, South Carolina, during the American Civil War. This book examines the circumstances and assigns responsibility for the devastating fires that consumed much of the city in February 1865. Was it the deliberate act of Union soldiers under General William Tecumseh Sherman, or were the fires started by fleeing Confederate forces and exacerbated by uncontrollable conditions?
James Ford Rhodes meticulously investigates the evidence, presenting a balanced account that considers various perspectives and testimonies. This book offers valuable insights into a pivotal moment in American history and sheds light on the complexities and controversies of wartime events. A crucial read for anyone interested in Civil War history and the enduring impact of historical narratives.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
