This study examines the question: "Is the United States adequately preparing to counter the theater land attack cruise missile (LACM) threat?" The U.S.' overwhelming conventional warfighting capabilities, demonstrated during the Gulf War and more recent conflicts, have led potential adversaries to examine asymmetric means to defeat U.S. strategy. Of particular concern are weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and the means to deliver them. To date, Department of Defense agencies and the Services, under the collective rubric of theater missile defense, have spent billions of dollars developing systems and architectures to theater missile threats, focusing primarily on theater ballistic missiles. However, proliferation of advanced technology may cause land attack cruise missiles to become a larger part of the theater threat equation in the near future. Cruise missiles' typically low radar and infrared signatures, as well as low-altitude (in some cases terrain-following) flight profiles, make them difficult to detect and defeat. Land attack cruise missiles are not a new threat; however, the last time they were used in combat by someone other than the U.S. was by Germany during World War II. This study examines the history of cruise missiles and theater missile defense.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
