This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
"The Scheme Of Secular Education Proposed By The National Public Schools' Association Compared With The Manchester And Salford Boroughs' Education Bill" examines a pivotal moment in the history of British education. This volume offers a detailed comparison of the National Public Schools' Association's secular education scheme with the Manchester and Salford Boroughs' Education Bill, providing valuable insights into the debates and proposals surrounding education in the 19th century.
Authored by Charles Richson and representing the perspectives of the National Public Schools' Association, the book sheds light on the arguments for and against secular education, the role of public schools, and the specific challenges faced by the boroughs of Manchester and Salford. It is an invaluable resource for historians, educators, and anyone interested in the development of educational policies in Victorian England.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
