This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
In "Defence Of The Version Of King James I, 'the Spirits In Prison, 1 Pet. Iii. 18-20', Against The Westminster Revision," Samuel Fuller presents a detailed argument defending the King James Version's interpretation of a contentious passage in the New Testament. Specifically, the book addresses the meaning of 1 Peter 3:18-20, which discusses Christ's preaching to "the spirits in prison." Fuller meticulously examines the theological implications of this passage, particularly in contrast to the Westminster Revision.
This work is essential for those interested in the history of biblical interpretation and the controversies surrounding different Bible translations. It offers valuable insights into the theological debates of the time and the enduring relevance of these discussions for contemporary readers. Fuller's defense provides a historical context for understanding varying interpretations and the importance of precise biblical scholarship.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
