This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
"A Critical Study Of The Historical Method Of Samuel Rawson Gardiner" delves into the methodologies employed by the eminent historian Samuel Rawson Gardiner. Roland Greene Usher presents a detailed analysis of Gardiner's approach to historical research and writing, particularly focusing on his treatment of 17th-century English history. The study includes an excursus examining the evolving historical conception of the Puritan Revolution, tracing its interpretation from Clarendon to Gardiner. This book is valuable for students and scholars of historiography, offering insights into the intellectual and methodological underpinnings of historical scholarship during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It remains a significant contribution to understanding the development of historical thought and the interpretation of key events in English history.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
