This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
In "Another Defence Of The Unity," Caleb Fleming presents a robust theological argument concerning the nature of God and the interpretation of key passages in the Gospel of John. Published in 1766, this work engages with contemporary theological debates, particularly those surrounding the doctrine of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus Christ. Fleming meticulously examines St. John's introduction to his Gospel and his account of the Word's being made flesh, offering a reasoned defense of his theological position.
The book includes remarks on various publications of the time, notably those by Dr. Benjamin Dawson and Dr. Kennicot, showcasing Fleming's engagement with the leading theological minds of his era. This work provides valuable insight into 18th-century religious thought and the ongoing discussions about biblical interpretation and theological doctrine. It remains a significant contribution to the study of Christian theology and the history of religious debate.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
