This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
This meticulously researched work, "An Examination Of The Objections Of Bishop Lowth, To The Account Given In Leland's Itinerary Of The Patronage And Education Of ... William Of Wykeham," delves into the historical debate surrounding the life and legacy of William of Wykeham, a significant figure in English history. Robert Uvedale critically analyzes Bishop Lowth's objections to John Leland's account of Wykeham's patronage and education, offering a counter-argument based on thorough research. The book sheds light on the historical controversies surrounding Wykeham's rise and the educational institutions he influenced, particularly Winchester College.
Readers interested in the history of education, biographical studies, and ecclesiastical debates will find this book a valuable resource. Uvedale's detailed examination offers fresh perspectives on a long-standing historical discussion, making it essential reading for scholars and enthusiasts alike.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
