This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
"The Common Tradition of the Synoptic Gospels in the Text of the Revised Version" delves into a meticulous examination of the shared textual heritage of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Authored by Edwin Abbott Abbott and William George Rushbrooke, this work, originally published in 1884, offers insights into the nuances of the Revised Version and its reflection of the Synoptic tradition.
This book provides a valuable resource for biblical scholars and historians interested in the textual criticism of the New Testament. It allows readers to understand the intricate relationships between the Gospels and the choices made during the revision process. Abbott and Rushbrooke's detailed analysis contributes significantly to the broader understanding of the development and transmission of the biblical text.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
