This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
"Habeas Corpus and Martial Law" presents a critical review of Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney's opinion in the case of John Merryman during the American Civil War. This volume delves into the complexities surrounding the suspension of habeas corpus and the imposition of martial law, offering valuable insights into the constitutional debates of the era.
Featuring contributions from Andrew Dickson White and Joel Parker, this work examines the legal and political ramifications of Taney's decision, providing a multifaceted perspective on a pivotal moment in American history. The essays explore the balance between civil liberties and national security during wartime, making it an essential resource for understanding the constitutional challenges faced during the Civil War.
This historical analysis remains relevant for scholars and anyone interested in the ongoing discourse on civil rights, executive power, and the rule of law.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
