This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Theism or Atheism: Which is More Reasonable? presents a compelling 19th-century debate between W. T. Lee and G. W. Foote, exploring the fundamental question of belief in God. Lee argues in favor of theism, presenting classical arguments for God's existence and addressing common objections. Foote, a prominent atheist, counters with critiques of theistic arguments and defenses of atheistic perspectives.
This volume captures a significant moment in the history of religious thought, providing readers with a clear and accessible entry point into the ongoing dialogue between faith and reason. The book offers valuable insights into the intellectual landscape of the late 19th century, making it an important resource for anyone interested in philosophy, religion, and the history of ideas.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
