This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
This intriguing book explores the controversial theory that Louis XVII, the lost Dauphin of France, was not killed during the French Revolution, but instead escaped to America and lived under the alias of Eleazar Williams. Francis Vinton meticulously examines the evidence, comparing the lives, personalities, and physical characteristics of Louis XVII and Eleazar Williams to determine if they could have been the same person.
Vinton delves into the historical context of the French Revolution, the mystery surrounding the Dauphin's fate, and the claims made by Eleazar Williams himself. The book presents a compelling case for the alleged survival of Louis XVII, challenging conventional historical narratives and inviting readers to reconsider one of history's most enduring mysteries. "Louis XVII and Eleazar Williams. Were They the Same Person?" is a fascinating read for anyone interested in French history, royal mysteries, and the enduring power of conspiracy theories.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
