This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
a??An Account of the Controversy Between Reginald Lord Grey of Ruthyn and Sir Edward Hastings, in the Court of Chivalry, in the Reign of King Henry IVa?? details a significant legal and social dispute from medieval England. This historical record offers insight into the workings of the Court of Chivalry and the complex relationships between noble families during the reign of Henry IV. The account explores the arguments and claims made by Reginald Lord Grey and Sir Edward Hastings, providing a valuable resource for understanding medieval law, aristocratic power struggles, and the social customs of the time.
This work sheds light on the lives and times of these influential figures, illuminating their roles in shaping the political landscape of England. Researchers and history enthusiasts will find this account a compelling window into a pivotal era in British history.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
