The Pretended Discovery of a Roman Bath at Bath [By E. Green?] With Remarks On a Recent Publication [By C.E. Davis] Entitled ‘the Bathes of Bathe’s Ayde in the Reign of Charles Ii'

This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.

This work, "The Pretended Discovery of a Roman Bath at Bath," delves into a historical controversy surrounding the purported rediscovery of a Roman bath in Bath. Attributed to Emanuel Green, the text critiques a publication by Charles Edward Davis entitled 'The Bathes of Bathe's Ayde in the Reign of Charles II'.

Green's remarks offer insights into the architectural and historical context of Bath, England, inviting readers to consider the varying interpretations and debates that shaped the understanding of its Roman past in the 19th century. This volume offers valuable perspectives on historical interpretation, architectural claims, and the academic disputes of its time, making it a compelling read for those interested in the history of Bath, Roman archaeology, and architectural history.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.