This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
A fascinating record of a six-night discussion between Charles Bradlaugh, a prominent freethinker and editor of the National Reformer, and Robert Roberts, editor of the Christadelphian and author of 'Twelve Lectures, ' this volume, "Is the Bible Divine?", captures a spirited 19th-century debate on the Bible's divine authority. Held in June 1876, the discussions delve into the heart of religious belief, examining arguments for and against the Bible's divine origin. Bradlaugh, known for his atheistic views, challenges Roberts, a staunch defender of biblical inerrancy, creating a compelling intellectual clash. This book offers a unique window into Victorian-era religious discourse and the evolving perspectives on faith and reason. Perfect for readers interested in religious studies, history of religion, and the history of freethought.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
