This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
In "A Reply to Dr. Payne's Strictures," James Alexander Haldane addresses criticisms leveled against his work on the doctrine of atonement. This book meticulously examines and defends Haldane's theological viewpoints against the arguments presented by Dr. Payne. Haldane's work offers insights into the nuances of early 19th-century theological discourse, particularly concerning atonement.
This volume will appeal to those interested in the history of Christian theology, the doctrine of atonement, and the intellectual debates that shaped religious thought during this transformative period. It is a valuable resource for theologians, historians, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the historical discussions surrounding core Christian beliefs.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
