This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
This is a historical document presenting Colonel Henry Orne's response to criticisms from Nathaniel Greene, David Henshaw, and others. Published in 1829, "Reply of Colonel Orne to The Attacks of Mr. Nathaniel Greene, and David Henshaw, and Others, in The" offers insight into the political climate and rivalries of the era. It provides a first-hand account of the disputes involving Orne, Greene, Henshaw, and related figures like Samuel Jones, WILLIAM KNAPP, and those associated with the 'Statesman' party. The text reveals details of the committee of correspondence, mentions figures such as John Redman and John Adams, and touches upon the political dynamics within Massachusetts and the Republican party. The reply sheds light on the controversies and personal attacks prevalent in early 19th-century American politics.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
