This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
This document, "A Reply of the Board of Managers to a Report of a Committee of the Stockholders of the Columbia, Pa," presents a detailed account of the Columbia Bridge Company's operations and financial standing around 1820. It addresses concerns raised by stockholders, focusing on the company's adherence to its Act of Incorporation and By-laws. Key figures such as Horace Binney, William Wright, and James Buchanan are mentioned in connection to legislative actions and company management.
The report provides insight into the dividends, capital stock, and overall governance of the bridge company. The document sheds light on early 19th-century infrastructure finance and corporate practices in Pennsylvania, making it a valuable resource for researchers interested in transportation history and economic development.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
