This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Explore a pivotal moment in American legal history with the "Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1832, Delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in the Case of Samuel A. Worcester, Plaintiff in Error, versus the State of Georgia." This meticulously prepared edition presents the landmark Supreme Court decision on "Worcester v. Georgia," including a detailed "Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States."
Authored by John Marshall, this document provides unparalleled insight into constitutional and Native American law during the 19th century. The case, concerning Georgia's laws and their impact on tribal sovereignty, remains a crucial point of reference for understanding the relationship between federal and state law.
Delve into the complexities of this historical legal battle, which directly addresses issues of federal authority, state rights, and the rights of Native American tribes. This publication is essential for anyone interested in United States history, constitutional law, and the evolution of legal precedent regarding Native American affairs. A vital resource for understanding a critical period in the development of American jurisprudence.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
