Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
Now that responsibility for welfare policy has devolved from Washington to the states, Winston examines how the welfare policymaking process has changed. Under the Welfare Reform Act of 1996, welfare was the first and most basic safety net programme to be sent back to state control. Will the shift help or further diminish programmes for low-income people, especially the millions of children who comprise the majority of the poor in the US? In this text Winston probes the nature of state welfare politics under devolution and contrasts it with welfare politics on the national level. She analyses the influence of interest groups and other key actors in the legislative process at both the state and national levels. She compares the legislative process during the 104th Congress (1995-96) with that in three states - Maryland, Texas and North Dakota - and finds that the debates in the states saw a more limited range of participants, with fewer of them representing poor people, and fewer competing ideas.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
Now that responsibility for welfare policy has devolved from Washington to the states, Winston examines how the welfare policymaking process has changed. Under the Welfare Reform Act of 1996, welfare was the first and most basic safety net programme to be sent back to state control. Will the shift help or further diminish programmes for low-income people, especially the millions of children who comprise the majority of the poor in the US? In this text Winston probes the nature of state welfare politics under devolution and contrasts it with welfare politics on the national level. She analyses the influence of interest groups and other key actors in the legislative process at both the state and national levels. She compares the legislative process during the 104th Congress (1995-96) with that in three states - Maryland, Texas and North Dakota - and finds that the debates in the states saw a more limited range of participants, with fewer of them representing poor people, and fewer competing ideas.