Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier. Sign in or sign up for free!

Become a Readings Member. Sign in or sign up for free!

Hello Readings Member! Go to the member centre to view your orders, change your details, or view your lists, or sign out.

Hello Readings Member! Go to the member centre or sign out.

Advancing the Framework for Assessing Causality of Health and Welfare Effects to Inform National Ambient Air Quality Standard Reviews
Paperback

Advancing the Framework for Assessing Causality of Health and Welfare Effects to Inform National Ambient Air Quality Standard Reviews

$93.99
Sign in or become a Readings Member to add this title to your wishlist.

As part of its responsibilities under the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the air pollutants carbon monoxide, lead, oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, ozone, and sulfur dioxide. EPA uses a "weight of evidence approach" to evaluate evidence from scientific studies and describe the causal relationships between these "criteria pollutants" and any adverse impacts on human health and on public welfare - including impacts on wildlife, water, forests, agriculture, and climate. The evaluation, called an Integrated Science Assessment, is used to inform standards setting associated with the criteria pollutants.

This report, produced at the request of EPA, describes EPAs and several other frameworks for inferring causality of health or welfare effects and the characteristics of evidence useful for forming a causal determination. The report concludes that EPAs causal framework is effective, reliable, and scientifically defensible, provided that key scientific questions are identified and a range of necessary expertise is engaged. More transparency in how EPA integrates evidence could improve confidence in their determinations, and more guidance is needed in the framework on how evidence should be examined for vulnerable groups (e.g., human sub-populations) and sensitive ecosystems or species.

Table of Contents

Front Matter Summary 1 Introduction 2 Historical and Legal Perspectives on the NAAQS Framework for Assessing Causality 3 Definition of Causality 4 Influence of the Individual Study on the Body of Evidence 5 Evidence Synthesis in Integrated Science Assessments 6 Example Critiques of the ISA Process and Causal Determination Framework 7 Illustrative Frameworks for Causal Determinations 8 Emerging Methods for Observational Studies Contributing to Causal Determinations 9 Use of the Framework to Assess Both Health and Welfare Effects 10 Conclusions and Recommendations References Appendix A: Committee Member Biographies Appendix B: Open Session Agendas Appendix C: Introduction to Causal Inference Principles

Read More
In Shop
Out of stock
Shipping & Delivery

$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout

MORE INFO
Format
Paperback
Publisher
National Academies Press
Country
United States
Date
21 January 2023
Pages
186
ISBN
9780309690119

As part of its responsibilities under the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the air pollutants carbon monoxide, lead, oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter, ozone, and sulfur dioxide. EPA uses a "weight of evidence approach" to evaluate evidence from scientific studies and describe the causal relationships between these "criteria pollutants" and any adverse impacts on human health and on public welfare - including impacts on wildlife, water, forests, agriculture, and climate. The evaluation, called an Integrated Science Assessment, is used to inform standards setting associated with the criteria pollutants.

This report, produced at the request of EPA, describes EPAs and several other frameworks for inferring causality of health or welfare effects and the characteristics of evidence useful for forming a causal determination. The report concludes that EPAs causal framework is effective, reliable, and scientifically defensible, provided that key scientific questions are identified and a range of necessary expertise is engaged. More transparency in how EPA integrates evidence could improve confidence in their determinations, and more guidance is needed in the framework on how evidence should be examined for vulnerable groups (e.g., human sub-populations) and sensitive ecosystems or species.

Table of Contents

Front Matter Summary 1 Introduction 2 Historical and Legal Perspectives on the NAAQS Framework for Assessing Causality 3 Definition of Causality 4 Influence of the Individual Study on the Body of Evidence 5 Evidence Synthesis in Integrated Science Assessments 6 Example Critiques of the ISA Process and Causal Determination Framework 7 Illustrative Frameworks for Causal Determinations 8 Emerging Methods for Observational Studies Contributing to Causal Determinations 9 Use of the Framework to Assess Both Health and Welfare Effects 10 Conclusions and Recommendations References Appendix A: Committee Member Biographies Appendix B: Open Session Agendas Appendix C: Introduction to Causal Inference Principles

Read More
Format
Paperback
Publisher
National Academies Press
Country
United States
Date
21 January 2023
Pages
186
ISBN
9780309690119